ASL
Confirm with Danny:
Label time 1500 ms
...
Slice time = 37.5ms ( = (TR-LT-DT)/slices)
TE = 12 ms
Label efficiency = 0.85
First image = label
Subject-specific notes
IBS6037 - no post ASL
IBS6081 - post ASL is cut off
Set ID168N80G2:
IBS5634_MED2M
I feel like
The images in this study set seem overall more problematic than other ASL study sets, many have intensity issues, but here I'm just listing severely erased/cut scans.
Weirdly, some problematic scans are not problematic in other study sets, which leads me to believe this is not a problem of the original image scan itself , but something must have happened to the image during preprocessing. I checked other IBS5634_MED2M in different study sets, and they looked fine.scans during preprocessing?
| ID168N80G2 pre | Scan |
|---|---|
IBS6119_MEDPRE
|  |
IBS6191_MEDPRE
|  |
| ID168N80G2 post | Scan |
|---|---|
| IBS5634_MED2M |  |
| IBS6093_MED2M |  |
| IBS6251_MED2M |  |
| IBS6259_MED2M |  |