Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

Version 1 Next »

  • Absolutely does not work to have students select their own group. Many groups just chatted and did not do any work.

    • Need to set up group dynamic; class dynamic was a problem, people did not trust each other, which meant they asked to not be randomly assigned. I did as they asked, but that turned out to be a mistake.

  • 2022 students are happy to ignore what I ask them to do; they will complete a written activity, but they will simply not do what asked in class.

  • The learning activities really work, based on feedback.

  • Getting feedback on activities really helps know what worked.

  • Reflections week-to-week are great, help see what is picked up in podcasts, activities. Also gives a chance to see where class is at, as students reported feeling stressed with mid-terms

  • Need a more rigorous way to measure participation and writing. People don’t report accurately whether they have done some activities

  • If people don’t respond to a question, asking them to answer in a forum leads them to answer.

  • Using demonstrations of activities is something I should add. The demonstration of the 90 sec (3 x 30 sec) talk helped, I think.

  • Might move the flow writing content earlier.

  • Design activities that the TA’s can run - probably three each.

  • No labels